Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.

PURPOSES: To compare the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) between Ethicon manual circular staplers (two-row) versus Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology (three-row) and between Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ Series technology (two-row) versus Tri-Staple™ technology. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients who underwent a left-sided colorectal surgery 2019-2022 in U.S. Premier Healthcare Database to assess the risk of AL within 30 days post-index procedure. The study devices were Ethicon manual circular staplers, Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology, and Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology. RESULTS: Across 447 hospitals, the cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of AL within 30 days post-index procedure were 7.78% (6.91-8.74%) among 8337 patients in the Ethicon manual circular stapler cohort, 7.54% (6.87-8.27%) among 7928 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology cohort, and 8.19% (6.57-10.07%) among 1306 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology cohort. Comparative analyses revealed no difference comparing Ethicon manual circular staplers with Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with Tri-Staple™ technology (risk ratio [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01) or comparing Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with DST™ technology to Tri-Staple™ technology (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.06). CONCLUSION: In this analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing a left-sided colorectal surgery from a U.S. hospital database, the risk of AL observed with manual two-row circular staplers was similar to that seen with three-row devices. This study affirms the safety of manual two-row circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis.

Evolution of a novel technology for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a safety perspective of magnetic sphincter augmentation.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation using the LINX® device is a minimally invasive surgical option for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. An estimated 30,000 devices have been implanted worldwide. Device removals and erosion are identified risks. The objective of this analysis is to explore the procedure evolution with an emphasis on the removals and associated characteristics that may guide future clinical practice. The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience and Ethicon's complaint databases were queried for all surgical device explants since January 2013. Device unit sales were used to determine the rates. The endpoint was based upon the time from implant to explant. Explant and erosion rates were calculated at yearly intervals and the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to measure the time to explant. Chi-square analyses were used to investigate the risk of explant associated with the size, geography and implant year. Overall, 7-year cumulative risk of removal was 4.81% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) CI: 4.31-5.36%). The likelihood of removal was significantly related to the device size (P < 0.0001), with smaller sizes being more likely to be explanted. The primary reasons for device removal and relative percentages were dysphagia/odynophagia (47.9%), persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (20.5%) and unknown/other (11.2%). Overall, the 7-year cumulative risk of erosion was 0.28% (95% CI: 0.17-0.46%). The average device size increased from 14.2 beads ± 1.0 in 2013 to 15.3 beads ± 1.2 in 2019 (P < 0.001). Surgical technique and perioperative management play an important role in the outcomes. Clinical practice changes since magnetic sphincter augmentation has been incorporated into clinical use are associated with improved outcomes and should be further characterized. Smaller device size is associated with increased removal and erosion rates.

Metastases of well-differentiated thyroid cancer to the gastrointestinal system.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of distant metastases at the time of initial presentation of well-differentiated thyroid cancer is approximately 4%. During the course of treatment and follow-up, the prevalence of distant metastases ranges from 2% in low-risk patients up to 33% in high-risk patients. When present, distant metastases occur primarily in the lungs and, to a lesser extent, in bones. Of all sites for distant metastasis, gastrointestinal metastases of thyroid cancer are very uncommon and account for 0.5-1% of all distant metastases. SUMMARY: Indications of metastases to the gastrointestinal system can be overlooked with traditional total body radioisotope scans that image the abdomen, including both diagnostic and posttherapy scans, because of the confounding presence of physiologic enteric radioactivity. When suspected in high-risk patients, other imaging procedures such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and PET-computed tomography should be considered. This communication will review thyroid cancer metastases to the gastrointestinal system in regard to occurrence rate, diagnosis, and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the extreme rarity of patients with metastases of thyroid cancer to the gastrointestinal tract, long-term follow-up data as well as information on prognosis are very limited. Aggressive management may provide symptomatic relief or palliation, but cure is unlikely once widespread metastases supervene. Attempts at complete or near-complete surgical resection of the metastases invading the digestive tract, followed by 131-I treatment, offer the best opportunity for improvement but will only rarely result in cure in selected patients.

Phase II trial of concurrent paclitaxel, carboplatin, and external-beam radiation followed by surgical resection in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, protocol 99-444.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the utility and outcomes of concurrent weekly low-dose chemotherapy with concurrent radiation in an effort to "downstage" patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIA (T1-3 N2 or T3 N1) and 3 patients with stage IIB (T3 N0) NSCLC were enrolled. Seventeen of 18 patients with stage IIIA cancer had N2 disease. A chemotherapy/radiation schedule consisted of paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2 )and carboplatin administered at an area under the curve of 2 weekly for 5 weeks along with chest irradiation of 45 Gy. Patients with regressed or stable disease upon restaging were considered surgical candidates. Patients deemed inoperable were given additional radiation therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled from April 2000 to March 2004. Data from 21 patients were available for evaluation at the time of analysis. Grade 3/4 constitutional and pulmonary toxicity was